Improvements to risk management and site scoring coming into effect in May 2026

Video guide to scoring changes in the Extranet

 

 

Insight, transparency and consistency

From April 12 2026, LABC Warranty will introduce an improved site scoring framework that will offer you clearer visibility of workmanship standards while maintaining the robust inspection approach our surveyors are known for.

This improved scoring framework will complement changes to our risk management approach that will emphasise quality in construction at Key Stages above all else.

In addition, our focus will move from areas like site tidiness and health & safety to put emphasis on the quality observed on individual plots or blocks inspected.

Click here to jump to our FAQs.

 

The key changes

As part of the improvements, the existing Site Workmanship Score will end and will be replaced by a Key Stage Score.

Scoring areas like site tidiness and health & safety will disappear and be replaced by quality scores for construction Key Stages.

To support the above, the 1-5 site rating will be immediately phased out to be replaced by a 1-6 scoring system for every Key Stage on your site.

While your scores may have a different numerical value after this change is implemented, we must stress that there is no continuity between your old 1-5 scores and your new 1-6 scores.

What you’ll see on site

In addition to these changes, how LABC Warranty approaches site inspections will also change. On top of our general focus on quality, your Risk Management Surveyor will be asked to inspect all visible elements of a site.

In practice, this means that when a Surveyor is called to your site to inspect plots or blocks at any of the key stages, they will also conduct warranty inspections on any other plots available in-build.

More information on how the inspection and scoring regime is changing is available further on in this document.

 

Why this change is necessary

The improvements described above will empower you to put the focus on the quality of individual plots and blocks.

By putting quality on a pedestal, together we can maintain the highest standards in homebuilding, and in turn offer you a more insightful, granular look at your site performance.

This includes offering you:

  • Data on the performance of every single plot or block on your site.
  • Photographic evidence of every single plot and block inspected by your Surveyor.
  • A 1-6 scoring system to make performance comparison across sites easier.

 

1-6 scoring in practice

The refreshed scoring system will use 1-6. A plot that is not compliant with LABC Warranty’s Technical Standards cannot register a score higher than a 3, regardless of other quality observed in the construction.

The table below shows how workmanship on your site is evaluated during a warranty inspection, helping to highlight strengths and recognise the quality demonstrated across individual plots or blocks.

1-6

Quality

Definition

1

Very poor

Significant number of non-compliances with our Technical Manual and/or Building Regulations. Significant risk of a claim and imminent danger in regard to health and safety.

2

Poor

Many minor non-compliances and/or some significant non-compliances with our Technical Manual and/or Building Regulations.

3

Requires improvement

Some minor non compliances with our Technical Manual and/or building regulations.

4

Good

Complies with our Technical Manual and building regulations.

5

Very good

Complies and shows extra attention to detail beyond requirements

6

Outstanding

Complies and the work seen cannot be improved upon.

 

Enhanced reporting suite brings insights

On top of changes to the scoring framework and inspection regime, this improvement also delivers enhanced reporting for builders and developers.

This includes:

  • Plot-by-plot, or block-by-block scoring.
  • Key Stage-level reports and scoring.
  • Site-level scores on Key Stages, created by averaging the scores of individual plots and blocks.
  • Plot-level register of defects and risks (risk defined as something which, unremedied, may develop into a defect in the future).

These powerful reports let you take an in-depth, granular, and transparent look at performance and quality on your sites.

 

Clear scoring at Key Stages

To make performance data more transparent and easier to interpret, house builders will now see scoring aligned to four stages of construction (dependent on risk) or five if you are building apartments:

  • Foundations – Every plot or block on a site will be individually inspected at foundation stage.
  • Superstructure – The first plot to reach end of the Superstructure stage will be inspected and scored. This plot will be used as a benchmark for quality for all other plots for scoring consistency and transparency. The remaining plots will be scored as the stage progresses.
  • Pre Plaster – As above, a plot or block reaching Pre-Plaster stage will be inspected as a benchmark for all other plots in progress.
  • Pre Handover – Every plot or block will be individually inspected.
  • Roof (for apartment schemes only)

This reflects natural build milestones without limiting the breadth of our inspection process.

 

Multiple scores per stage – one compliance outcome

Because construction progresses differently plot-to-plot:

  • A plot/block may be scored multiple times within the same Key Stage.
  • For houses, however, the lowest score recorded for that stage is the compliance score used for reporting and measuring performance.
  • Subsequent scores offer insight into progress and improvements but do not replace the compliance score.

This ensures fairness while recognising the dynamic nature of on-site activity.

 

Not an end-of-stage only inspection regime

We must be clear: the new scoring framework does not replace or reduce the frequency and depth of our surveyors’ inspections.

Surveyors will continue to carry out:

  • Full risk-based inspections.
  • Whole site inspections.
  • Additional checks where concerns arise.
  • Plot-specific reviews at all stages of the build.

These inspections remain a core part of how we safeguard build quality, proactively support developers, and identify issues before they escalate.

 

Enhanced reporting through the Extranet

We are upgrading our existing Inspection Summary Activity Report to display the new scoring format, making it easier for developers to:

  • Track performance at each Key Stage.
  • View average scores per order, office, or region.
  • Deep dive into scoring trends across multiple developments.
  • Access photos linked to each recorded score.
  • Download raw scoring data for further analysis.

A new Site Scoring Analysis MI report will also allow deeper insight across offices, regions, and time periods.

 

Built on industry-leading tools and technical expertise

You will continue to benefit from our full ecosystem of support, including:

  • The Extranet for end-to-end project visibility.
  • Remote access to documentation, MI reports, and inspection plans.
  • Technical Standards Online and further guidance resources.
  • Site Quality Reviews and Early Engagement Consultancy.
  • Technical training and CITB-accredited courses (with up to 50% funding for qualifying organisations).

 

Frequently asked questions

Explore the answers to the most frequently asked questions about our site scoring below, or download a copy of the FAQ document here

Why has the scoring system changed?

The scoring system has been updated to improve clarity for developers and align scoring to key construction stages, while still supporting visibility of workmanship quality.

Is this an end-of-stage only inspection process?

No. Although scores are presented only at the Key Stages, surveyors will continue to undertake risk-based inspections, whole-site reviews, and plot-level checks throughout the build. This ensures ongoing quality monitoring beyond the staged scoring framework.

Which stages will be scored?

You will see scores for:

  • Foundations.
  • Superstructure.
  • Pre Plaster.
  • Pre Handover.
  • Roof stages (for apartment blocks).

These stages offer a clear, consistent view of build progress (additional inspections may be undertaken where risks are identified).

How does the scoring work?

The updated numerical scoring now runs on a 1–6 scale , replacing the older 1–5 system.

  • 1–3 = not compliant with technical standards.
  • 4–6 = compliant with technical standards.

Surveyors assign a score based on the quality they observe against the relevant stage of works. Plot or block scores are generated individually and stage scores reflect the averaged output of the units inspected.

What do the scores mean?

The table below shows how workmanship on your site is evaluated during a warranty inspection, helping to highlight strengths and recognise the quality demonstrated across individual plots or blocks.

1-6

Quality

Definition

1

Very poor

Significant number of non-compliances with our Technical Manual and/or Building Regulations. Significant risk of a claim and imminent danger in regard to health and safety.

2

Poor

Many minor non-compliances and/or some significant non-compliances with our Technical Manual and/or Building Regulations.

3

Requires improvement

Some minor non compliances with our Technical Manual and/or building regulations.

4

Good

Complies with our Technical Manual and building regulations.

5

Very good

Complies and shows extra attention to detail beyond requirements

6

Outstanding

Complies and the work seen cannot be improved upon.

Will my scores go down?

We do not anticipate that scores will go down as we move to a 1-6 scoring system, but we must also stress that your scoring data pre May 2026 will not migrate into the new 1-6 system.  

Your first inspection under the new system will generate scores against new criteria, and your site will start accruing new scores from scratch.

There is no continuity between your old 1-5 score and your new 1-6 score.

 

How are awards affected?

Very little is changing with awards, and you should not notice any awards-related changes as we shift from one scoring framework to another.

Adherence to the Technical Manual and the Good Practice Guide will always pay dividends when it comes to awards judging, and putting the construction of quality homes first will always be our joint aim.

An award-winning site today will still be in awards contention after this change is deployed.

Can a plot be scored more than once in the same stage?

Yes. Plots may be scored multiple times as works progress.

However, the lowest score recorded within that stage becomes the compliance score, used for formal reporting and performance tracking.

Subsequent scores provide additional insight on quality, but do not replace the compliance score.

Will photos accompany scores?

Yes. Each score will include a site photograph to illustrate why that score was given, improve clarity, and support discussions between site teams and surveyors.

How does this affect previous scores?

Legacy 1–5 scores will remain available on the Extranet but will not be used going forward.

Under the updated scoring approach starting from April 2026, all sites begin building scores fresh under the 1–6 scale.

You will be able to view and download your historical scoring data from within the reporting suite.

When will I be scored?

Scoring is captured at the key construction stages only. While surveyors continue to carry out risk inspections throughout the build, stage-based scoring provides a clear and consistent reporting structure for developers.

Where can I view my scores?

In the same place you have always found them. Your new scores will be available on our Extranet, alongside historical records and associated site photographs.

How can I view my old scores?

Your 1-5 scores will be available to view or download from our Extranet at your convenience.

What should I do if I have questions?

Your first port of call for questions should be your assigned Risk Management Surveyor. They would be happy to answer questions about scoring specific to your site.

Contact us with a question

If you have a question about how the changes site scoring might affect your work, please fill out the form below and we'll reply as soon as we're able to.

Latest from LABC

Latest LABC Warranty Good Practice Guide live now

About the Good Practice Guide

The Guide is our blueprint to what LABC Warranty’s Risk Management Surveyor’s are looking

Learn more

Sean Sadler of Morris Homes scoops National Site Manager of the Year Award

Learn more

Version 13 of LABC Warranty Technical Manual live now

Learn more

LABC Warranty launches online shop for training and marketing materials

Learn more